How it sometimes feels trying to scale an AI enablement business, illustrated by Alice (in Wonderland) Falling Down Rabbit Hole

A founder we work with recently described his situation: "I closed $4.2m last year. I should feel great. Instead, I'm working harder than ever and the business is barely growing."

He's not alone. After speaking with 100+ AI enablement founders over the past six months, we've identified a consistent pattern: the $4m to $6m transition is where fast-growing firms hit a wall.

The paradox of early success

AI enablement businesses (training, consulting and implementation) reach meaningful revenue faster than almost any other business model. The dynamics are stacked in your favor:

You sell from day one. While SaaS founders spend their first year (often longer) building prototypes and running low-paid "design partnerships," you're closing real deals and getting real feedback. Without a funding cushion, you can't afford to waste time disguising lack of product-market fit. Every project must be sold and delivered at a profit.

Deal sizes are substantial. A $100k-$200k engagement is routine. We've seen three-year-old firms win $500k projects. In SaaS, six-figure annual contracts typically require enterprise sales motions that don't materialize until after a Series B.

Demand is unprecedented. Every company wants help with their AI strategy. The phone rings.

This is intoxicating. It's also a trap.

You can reach $4m while the founder personally handles sales, delivery and operations. Twenty customers at $200k average. A few larger implementation projects. Some executive workshops.

Then everything breaks at once.

The great consulting plateau

Sales hits a ceiling. Every AI enablement firm we've studied—from $500k to $10m—still has founder involvement in sales. People are the product. Your credibility opens doors, builds trust, closes deals.

At about $4m, this becomes a constraint. Prospects in different countries want meetings on the same day. Pipeline generation suffers because there's no time for top-of-funnel work. Every new customer requires your presence, but your presence doesn't scale.

Delivery strains. Running several projects simultaneously means you can't stay hands-on with each one. You start delegating to junior leads who are smart and eager but haven't developed the judgment to navigate complex stakeholder dynamics.

Things go sideways. Politics escalate. You become the firefighter, smoothing over relationships and getting projects back on track. This is reactive, exhausting, and unsustainable.

Operations accumulate as debt. Early on, handling invoicing and payroll on Thursday evenings feels manageable. Hiring an Operations Associate feels indulgent compared to hiring another engineer.

By $4m, you have 20+ employees. The "temporary" workarounds have become permanent. And there's never time to fix them because you're too busy with sales and delivery and firefighting.

Strategy disappears. Without external investors, most AI enablement firms lack a formal board. We've encountered 30-person companies operating without budgets or detailed planning. Founders feel less like CEOs and more like their company's most effective salesperson who also handles admin.

Everything urgent crowds out everything important.

Running to stand still

Lewis Carroll captured this dynamic in Alice in Wonderland: "Here we must run as fast as we can, just to stay in place."

At $4m, you're running faster than ever. Growth flatlines anyway. Every step forward triggers two steps backward elsewhere in the business.

Some founders get so frustrated they start contemplating an exit.

Four moves that create leverage

The counterintuitive truth: pushing harder makes things worse. What works is creating leverage—systems and people that multiply your impact instead of consuming your time.

Quarterly strategy retreats

Take one day per quarter to step back completely.

When we facilitate these sessions, founders consistently tell us it's the first time in months they've thought deeply about their business. New ideas surface. Clarity emerges. And the insights come from the founders themselves—not from us.

The specific framework matters less than the discipline. Patrick Lencioni's Death by Meeting offers a good starting structure. What matters is scheduling the time and protecting it.

An advisory board (without raising capital)

You don't need investors to build a board. Many bootstrapped firms create advisory boards with experienced peers,  senior functional experts, or exited founders who’ve done it before.

The real value isn't even the advice. It's the forcing function. Explaining your challenges to people outside the business creates clarity. Preparing for quarterly meetings makes you articulate problems you've been avoiding.

Ruthless specialization

Services businesses deliver custom solutions. But starting every engagement from zero and running unrelated projects in parallel compounds complexity exponentially.

Niche down. Become the expert in a specific industry vertical, or for a specific function, or a specific problem type. This makes sales cycles shorter, delivery more efficient, and your junior team more credible in client conversations.

Specialization has another dimension: the type of work itself. Are you solving novel problems that demand original thinking? Known problems with complex, multifaceted solutions? Or standardized problems where execution speed wins? David Maister called these Brains, Grey Hair, and Procedure—three fundamentally different consulting models he outlined in 1993 that remain essential today. The distinction shapes everything: your pricing, your hiring profile, and the clients you pursue.

The fear is that you'll turn away business. The reality is that you'll win more of the business that matters.

Honest accounting of your time

Most founders treat their time as free. The logic seems sound—you own the business, so any cost saved by doing it yourself is money in your pocket.

This accounting is wrong.

Every hour spent delivering a $15k workshop is an hour not spent building systems or hiring people who could deliver ten workshops. Your time is your company's most expensive resource precisely because it's irreplaceable.

Unless you intend to stay a solopreneur, the path forward looks surprisingly similar to SaaS: processes, leverage, and people.

The EBITDA trade-off

Breaking through $4m means temporarily sacrificing margin to invest in infrastructure. Hire the operations lead you've been avoiding. Build the delivery management layer your projects need. Formalize the processes that exist only in your head.

This feels uncomfortable for bootstrapped founders accustomed to profitability. But the alternative is worse: a business that consumes all your time without growing.

You can't push your way through the $4m ceiling. You have to build your way through it.

Daria

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading


No posts found